Olfaction in nasal polyp patients after Reboot surgery: an endotype-based prospective study.

PURPOSE: To report biomarkers present in the olfactory mucosa in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in comparison with nasal polyps and to nasal mucosal tissues from control patients. To evaluate the kinetics of smell over 6 months in patients who underwent Reboot surgery. METHODS: Cohort study from May 2021 to May 2022. We collected samples of olfactory mucosa and nasal polyps from 16 CRSwNP patients and inferior turbinate samples from 20 control subjects. The study was not randomized for surgical and/or medical treatment. Samples were analyzed by Luminex and Unicap 100 to measure biomarkers of inflammation (IL1-ß, IL4, IL5, IL6, IL17, CCL3, CCL4, G-CSF, SE-IgE, total IgE and ECP). 12 of the CRSwNP patients underwent Extended Sniffin'tests at timepoints 1-4 days pre-surgery, and 1, 3 and 6 months after Reboot surgery. RESULTS: Type-2 markers were significantly elevated in OM and polyp tissue in CRSwNP (n = 16) vs. controls (n = 20), P < 0.05. TDI scores improved already 1 month (P < 0.05) after surgery and remained stable for 6 months. Type-2 inflammation in nasal polyps was associated with decreased sense of smell and taste before surgery, but improved after surgery (P = 0.048). Type-3 inflammation was present in the olfactory mucosa and was associated with a better sense of smell before surgery, but a smaller improvement of smell afterward. CONCLUSIONS: Type-2 inflammation is present in the olfactory mucosa in CRSwNP patients and is associated with smell loss. Reboot surgery, aiming to completely remove inflamed sinus mucosa, significantly improves the smell in this group of patients.

Reboot surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: recurrence and smell kinetics.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the time for recovery of the sense of smell in patients with CRSwNP who underwent Reboot surgery compared to patients undergoing ESS in a long-term follow-up study. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from 168 patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP, who underwent revision surgery, either as Extended Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (Reboot, 140 patients) or as regular Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (ESS, 28 patients) between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, aiming to compare the outcome of surgeries after 2 years of follow-up. Sense of smell was scored as judged by the patient using scores 0 to 3 reflecting a percentage estimate of remaining smell. RESULTS: Smell improved similarly in the Reboot and ESS groups over the first 9 months, which was maintained over 24 months in the Reboot, but not the ESS group (p = 0.007 after 18 months, p = 0.001 after 24 months). Furthermore, polyp recurrence rates were significantly lower in the Reboot group. CONCLUSION: Reboot surgery significantly improved olfactory function and significantly reduced nasal polyp recurrence rates over 2 years post-operatively. Therefore, Reboot should be considered for patients with uncontrolled severe CRSwNP, specifically when ESS failed, to offer long-term smell and a polyp-free status. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b.

Salivary glands are a target for SARS-CoV-2: a source for saliva contamination.

The ability of the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 to spread and contaminate is one of the determinants of the COVID-19 pandemic status. SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in saliva consistently, with similar sensitivity to that observed in nasopharyngeal swabs. We conducted ultrasound-guided postmortem biopsies in COVID-19 fatal cases. Samples of salivary glands (SGs; parotid, submandibular, and minor) were obtained. We analyzed samples using RT-qPCR, immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy, and histopathological analysis to identify SARS-CoV-2 and elucidate qualitative and quantitative viral profiles in salivary glands. The study included 13 female and 11 male patients, with a mean age of 53.12 years (range 8-83 years). RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 was positive in 30 SG samples from 18 patients (60% of total SG samples and 75% of all cases). Ultrastructural analyses showed spherical 70-100 nm viral particles, consistent in size and shape with the Coronaviridae family, in the ductal lining cell cytoplasm, acinar cells, and ductal lumen of SGs. There was also degeneration of organelles in infected cells and the presence of a cluster of nucleocapsids, which suggests viral replication in SG cells. Qualitative histopathological analysis showed morphologic alterations in the duct lining epithelium characterized by cytoplasmic and nuclear vacuolization, as well as nuclear pleomorphism. Acinar cells showed degenerative changes of the zymogen granules and enlarged nuclei. Ductal epithelium and serous acinar cells showed intense expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS receptors. An anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody was positive in 8 (53%) of the 15 tested cases in duct lining epithelial cells and acinar cells of major SGs. Only two minor salivary glands were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by immunohistochemistry. Salivary glands are a reservoir for SARS-CoV-2 and provide a pathophysiological background for studies that indicate the use of saliva as a diagnostic method for COVID-19 and highlight this biological fluid's role in spreading the disease. © 2021 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Salivary glands are a target for SARS-CoV-2: a source for salivacontamination

The ability of the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 to spread and contaminate is one of the determinants of the COVID-19 pandemic status. SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in saliva consistently, with similar sensitivity to that observed innasopharyngeal swabs. We conducted ultrasound-guided postmortem biopsies in COVID-19 fatal cases. Samples ofsalivary glands (SGs; parotid, submandibular, and minor) were obtained. We analyzed samples using RT-qPCR, immu-nohistochemistry, electron microscopy, and histopathological analysis to identify SARS-CoV-2 and elucidate qual-itative and quantitative viral proles in salivary glands. The study included 13 female and 11 male patients, with amean age of 53.12 years (range 8­83 years). RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 was positive in 30 SG samples from18 patients (60% of total SG samples and 75% of all cases). Ultrastructural analyses showed spherical 70­100 nm viral particles, consistent in size and shape with the Coronaviridae family, in the ductal lining cell cytoplasm,acinar cells, and ductal lumen of SGs. There was also degeneration of organelles in infected cells and the presence of acluster of nucleocapsids, which suggests viral replication in SG cells. Qualitative histopathological analysis showedmorphologic alterations in the duct lining epithelium characterized by cytoplasmic and nuclear vacuolization, as wellas nuclear pleomorphism. Acinar cells showed degenerative changes of the zymogen granules and enlarged nuclei.Ductal epithelium and serous acinar cells showed intense expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS receptors. An anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody was positive in 8 (53%) of the 15 tested cases in duct lining epithelial cells and acinar cellsof major SGs. Only two minor salivary glands were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by immunohistochemistry. Salivaryglands are a reservoir for SARS-CoV-2 and provide a pathophysiological background for studies that indicate theuse of saliva as a diagnostic method for COVID-19 and highlight this biological uid's role in spreading the disease.© 2021 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.